|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 2006 |
|
|
APLG |
|
Association des propriétaires
du lac Gagnon |
|
|
|
|
OPINION POLL RESULTS |
|
|
|
|
Number of participants: 272 |
|
|
| 1 |
Are
you sufficiently concerned about the future of lac Gagnon to ask City
Council to take more |
|
clearly-defined protection measures for
residential and recreational tourism development? |
|
|
|
|
Totally agree |
94% |
Agree |
5% |
Disagree |
0% |
Totally disagree |
1% |
|
|
| 2 |
Do
you agree with using lake front property to provide access to residents
or tourists in a second row of |
|
residences? |
|
|
|
Totally agree |
3% |
Agree |
9% |
Disagree |
19% |
Totally disagree |
69% |
|
|
| 3 |
Do you agree with having a second row of
cottages or residences (on the other side of the street)? |
|
|
|
Totally agree |
3% |
Agree |
13% |
Disagree |
19% |
Totally disagree |
65% |
|
|
| 4 |
Do you agree with providing easy
access to the lake for non-residents (e.g.: parking, boat launches)? |
|
|
|
Totally agree |
4% |
Agree |
16% |
Disagree |
24% |
Totally disagree |
56% |
|
|
| 5 |
Do
you think it is important to post water traffic and other regulations
(speed, shoreline protection, |
|
sanitation systems)? |
|
|
|
|
Totally agree |
76% |
Agree |
17% |
Disagree |
4% |
Totally disagree |
3% |
|
|
| 6 |
How
important is it to keep the beach at the south end in its natural state
for the benefit of all Duhamel |
|
residents? |
|
|
|
|
Very important |
89% |
Important |
10% |
Not very important |
1% |
Not important |
0% |
|
|
| 7 |
Do
you agree with asking elected officials to completely review the urban
development plan since many |
|
changes
were not brought to the attention of the urban development advisory
committee and residents |
|
during the public consultation
meetings? |
|
|
|
Totally agree |
83% |
Agree |
16% |
Disagree |
1% |
Totally disagree |
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|